Introducing President Elect Barack Obama

More to come...

MSNBC Calls Ohio for....Barack Obama!

Big news out of the Buckeye State, as its 20 electoral votes have been called for Senator Obama. In addition, New Mexico has been called by MSNBC.

Its looking like Senator Barack Obama is in a prime position to win this election.

Popular Vote
Obama: 15,666,461
McCain: 15,486,477

Electoral Vote
Obama: 200
McCain: 85

Obama will take Pennsylvania and New Hampshire

Well, that didn't work for Senator McCain. Pennsylvania and New Hampshire have been called for Obama, putting Obama in a pretty position.

Popular Vote
Obama: 3,024,111
McCain: 2,702,494

Electoral Vote
Obama: 103
McCain: 34

Election Night Coverage: IN and KY (EST) close

The count has begun, as the portions of Kentucky and Indiana in the Eastern Time Zone have now closed. Let it begin.

Popular Vote:
Obama 32
McCain 16

Electoral College
Obama 0
McCain 0

BREAKING...OBAMA WINS FIRST CONTEST OF ELECTION DAY!

Obama has won Dixville Notch 15-6, the first Democrat to do so since 1968!

May it be a better predictor of the state of New Hampshire than it was in the primary (or 1968, for that matter).

The bigger news is that Election Day 2008 has begun. Only 6.5 hours until polls open here in the Land of Lincoln.

Game On!

An Open Letter to ALL Voters

Dear fellow Voters of the United States of America,

If you have already voted, whether at early voting locations or by mailing in your absentee ballot, no need to read further. You have done your duty as an American citizen, and now is the time to get those who have yet to vote for your candidate to the polls.

It is very likely turn out tomorrow could be very high, especially in the various swing states that will decide this election. Lines could be long, and it might be easy for you to get discouraged, especially those of you who are hourly workers. This is understandable, as waiting in line is not one of the most enjoyable activities.

To those who might decide to skip voting tomorrow because of this, I just have one thing to say...

STAY IN THE FREAKING LINE!

Whether you support Obama, McCain, Barr, Nader, Paul, or any of the many other candidates on the ballot, just remember one thing...

STAY IN THE FREAKING LINE!

Democracy isn't easy, and sometimes it takes personal sacrifice to make it work. If that sacrifice is waiting in line, through good or bad weather, to take part in deciding our national interest, then so be it.

The decisions made in that voting booth will shape the path that our nation takes over the next two years, and in some cases even longer. Everything from the education of our children to the makeup of the Supreme Court depends upon you doing your duty at at polling place.

I know it can be hard to wait in line. Some places will be cold, others will be far too hot. Many line locations will be baking in the sun, while many others will be drenched with rain or covered in snow. You might get hungry or have to go to the bathroom. If so, have someone hold your place, or at the very least accept that you have to go to the back of the line. Nonetheless, please remember to...

STAY IN THE FREAKING LINE!

Decisions are made by those who show up. This is the simple truth of the matter, and is the foundation upon which our system of government is built. Don't like what the other candidate believes? Make sure you get to the polls and...

STAY IN THE FREAKING LINE!

Let me finish up by saying that this has been a grueling campaign trail, stretching back almost two years ago. We've been through many debates, lived and died by far too many polls, and spent far too much time caring what Nate Silver, Rachel Maddow, Pat Buchanan, and Al Giordano have to say. Tomorrow is the end of the line, at least for a little while. We all have but one duty left to do, and it is the one that makes all of the other crap worth it. So with that, I leave you with one last thought...

STAY IN THE FREAKING LINE!

Obama's Tax Plan

For those of you who are curious about Obama's Tax Plan, here it is in all of its details.

Simply put, this plan is far from the big bad old Marx. It gives 95% of American workers (none of those pesky "welfare queens" here) a tax cut of $500 per worker.

In addition, seniors making less than $50,000 will pay no taxes.

The big bad tax burden that supposedly is Obama's sinister plan to destroy the landed gentry? He will let the Bush tax cuts expire, moving the wealthy back up to a 39% instead of 36% tax bracket. In addition, the wealthy (to an extent) will have to pay a bit more into Social Security.

What about small business owners, like the hypothetical situation tied to Joe the fake Plumber? Remember that $250,000 figure is on net income, not gross revenue. If you take home $150,000 from your business, even though it has $2,000,000 in revenue, you still fall in to the tax bracket that will benefit. In addition, your startup or small business will not have to worry about capital gains taxes, and can benefit from tax credits for keeping employment here in the United States.

Obama's plan is sound, its equitable, and it will work. The rich will still be rich, and the rest of us might be able to find it just a little bit easier to succeed. The Obama administration would be best positioned to keep the American dream alive for all Americans, and not just those with money or connections.

On Sarah Palin

With election day just one doggone week away, you betcha I've got something to say about Joe...er...Sarah Palin. Now while I admit that I'm a fan of her accent, there are several things that, for a lack of more appropriate word, disturb me. First of all is her complete opposition against abortion. I understand that this is not anything new, but to not even consider the effect on a woman's rights to her body is a slap in the face to everyone who saw Roe v. Wade as a victory. Now, I don't mind people being pro-choice. I understand their reasoning. However, the idea that outlawing an abortion, even for extreme situations, is going to STOP abortion is just outright insane. When you oppose the legality of abortion, effectively you are opposing the opportunity for a woman to be in a safe, hygenic environment instead of a dark back alley with a coat hanger. On a different note; don't even get me started on the irony of advocating abstinence only education in schools. I was hoping her teenage daughter's pregnancy would be enough to show that knowledge is more important than dogma, and yet somehow she spinned it into trying to back up her logic. No doubt she's tought young Bristol well.
Should I go into "Dude" Palin? No? The moose hunting from a helicopter? Well, let me just say...I think the Beverly Hillbillies is a classic show but I wouldn't want the Clampetts in the White House. Swimmin' pools and politicans indeed. Now that I think of it, Palin's similarities to Jethro Bodine is just astounding.
Let's talk about the VP debate. While I grant that she did well, she didn't do well on her own. She was rehearsed, trained, and sounded more like she was reciting than truly speaking. I may sound like an elite liberal when I say this, but I also preferred Biden's "kitchen table" analogy over "Joe Six-pack" to represent the average American lifestyle.
As an environmental biology major, her "drill, baby, drill!" logic just makes me cringe completely. The only saving grace is that she wants to do it offshore...but ultimately whats next is going for the payload situated right under National Parks. Lobbyists have been trying to get resources out of parks before and this is nothing new, but I can see it escalating with having such a drilling gung-ho in office. Let me take a time out here to say something else: The thing that gets me is that this election I've noticed how oh-so cleverly "independence from foreign oil" has been played around by all sides. What REALLY should be focused on is independence from oil PERIOD. However, thats simply an ideal of my own and I can't realistically expect any politician to take that stance and still win an election.
Palin's readiness to joke about Obama's lack of experience is just frustrating, simply because she usually then throws in "as mayor of Wasilla.." which to me speaks no more than saying "oh I was President of the Student Body in college!" She also touts Alaska as the biggest state in the Union without mentioning that it has one of the smallest populations. I read somewhere the hypocrisy of a white woman attending 5 schools and not being called on it while if a black man did the same it would do nothing more than perpetuate a stereotype.
On a final note before I get rambling too much (more)...the insane logic behind those bitter die-hard Hillary supporters who turned to McCain-Palin...excuse me....Palin-McCain because of the idea that a uterus would be in the White House. Never mind what Palin stands for is a stark contrast from Clinton or that their hero Clinton has now enthusiastically endorsed Obama. I have no doubt in my mind that the minds behind the McCain campaign picked Palin largely because of her gender. The joke may be on them though; she's such a MAVERICK she's starting to piss them off too.

Scary Story from Rolling Stone

This story from Rolling Stone is very troublesome. I hope that the crap doesn't hit the fan, and cause the wrong candidate to win.

A request for Ms. Pfotenhauer and Gov. Palin

Dear Ms. Pfotenhauer and Gov. Palin,

I have to ask that you repeat your recent comments. You see, I missed them as I drove through the dimensional barrier between Mahomet, IL (Real America) and Champaign, FIL (Fake America) on my way to work today.


What's that? I can't hear you, it must be my fake American ears.

Jon Stewart said it best, and much more succinctly than a 2000 word rambling mess from me could.

On the Economy

After a discussion with a friend of mine yesterday, I got to thinking about economic politics. He was hesitant about Obama's economic plan, and I was trying to convince him of its soundness. After a while we agreed that the matter was complicated, and that something needed to be done. But before we came to that, he offered up some of the GOP's tried and true talking points.

Look, I'm a fan of the free market. For the most part it does its job well, rewarding good business activity, and punishing poor business activity. Although it has some glaring weaknesses (health care, education, environment, workers rights), it is much better than state run disasters such as the U.S.S.R.

The people of the United States like thinking this is a nation built on meritocracy, that it matters more what you do than what your father did. We have been raised to believe that with some hard  work, common sense, and a little luck and ingenuity we could succeed. 

But it is becoming harder and harder to achieve the American Dream. The discrepancy between the rich and poor has been growing steadily since the Reagan/Bush era, with only a temporary respite during the 90s. In fact, of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development nations, only Mexico and Turkey have a worse rich/poor discrepancy during this decade. The poor get poorer and the rich get richer, while the ever shrinking middle class struggles to hang on to what they have.

We have many issues facing our country, many problems to solve. But we will never solve them unless we move past the outmoded arguments of the past. 

Barack Obama's tax plan is a fair one. In exchange for a little higher taxes for the wealthy, 95% of the country will see their tax burden become lower. This total includes all but about 1% of small business owners, who will also see some other significant tax breaks. Joe the Plumber (who has been revealed as nothing more than a GOP shill) and his $40,000 salary would benefit significantly under Obama's plan. As the $250,000 would be net income from a small business, not revenue, it is very likely that he could still benefit once he bought his business.

In response to this, the GOP has brought out their old line of attack that has been around since at least 1980. Namely, that the poor are lazy welfare queens driving gold Cadillacs over the backs of the hard-working and earnest rich folk. This seems to play well with the low information working class voters, who have much more in common with the poor than the rich. 

The idea that there is an epidemic of women gaming the system to live high on the hog off of welfare is nothing but a urban myth. Using the obvious shortcomings of the welfare program, Reagan was able to turn people against the poor, and make them weary of any program meant to help those who live at the bottom of the economic ladder.

While there are certainly some poor people who do try to game the system (as if there aren't wealthy people who do the same thing), the vast majority of poor people are hard workers. They have to be, as the national welfare system was essentially scrapped by President Clinton and the GOP Congress in 1996. Many work two or three jobs, trying to keep up with their bills and give their children the best job possible. Despite the fact that they don't pay taxes, the extra money they will earn as a tax credit from Obama's plan could go far in feeding or clothing their children. 

So what is the solution? Clearly, the "trickle-down" philosophy of the Reagan/Bush/McCain Republicans is not working out for those on the bottom, even if it has helped those on top. Just as undesirable is a return to the bureaucratic mess that was the welfare state in the 1970s. Somehow there has to be a way we can combine the best of the free market with the best of pro-active government action. 

Whatever the solution, it is certain that Republicans and Democrats, young and old, rich and poor, should be involved. No matter our political leanings or wealth, this is our country, and it is about damn time we started taking responsibility for it.  Barack Obama has shown more promise in regards to bringing us together to solve these issues. This is one of many reasons why I am supporting him in his bid for the President of the United States.

Obama to visit his sick grandmother

Our thoughts and prayers are with Senator Obama and his family. May his grandmother recover and see her grandson be inaugurated as our 44th President.

Words of Wisdom

This post from Al Giordano over at the field is something that everyone should read. I must admit that too often I have reacted with too much anger at the words of the ignorant. However, engaging them peacefully can certainly be a good way to defuse the situation, and make them remember, if only for a while, their manners and rules of civility.

In other news, today was a pretty good day for Obama. His campaign announced a massive $150 million haul during September, and Colin Powell endorsed him for the presidency. Despite his infamous appearance before the UN that helped lead us to the mess in Iraq, Powell is still a very respected figure in American politics. The right wing attack machine has already geared up, screeching that Powell made this endorsement entirely on race (despite Powell's words that clearly showed otherwise).

We're down to 15 days folks. The end of this chapter of the American story is in sight. 

Game on!

The Return of McCarthyism?

So it has come to this. The wingnut faction of the Republican party (a faction that is entirely too large in that once great party), desperate to take down Senator Obama, has started implying Senator Obama is un-American.

I know Michelle Bachmann isn't exactly a model of sane statesmanship, but she isn't alone. Republicans as high up as Vice-Presidential nominee Sarah Palin have certainly implied how "dangerous" Obama and his associates are.

The facts to dispute their claims are too numerous and too easy to locate to repeat here. After all, this is a blog, not a 1000 page scholarly work.

Instead, I'll focus on the worrisome nature of her comments. This kind of hateful and undemocratic language hasn't been so prevalent since the days of Joe McCarthy. When did being a "liberal" become synonymous with being Anti-American? Without liberal concepts such as liberty, representative government, and basic and inalienable rights, our great experiment in democracy might not have lasted long enough for nutjobs like Bachmann to have the right to spout their gibberish on TV. I'm sure that has never crossed her addled mind.

But things aren't all lost. After that mess of an appearance on Hardball, concerned citizens have spoken with their pocketbook against the hate of Rep. Bachmann. Her opponent, Elwyn Tinklenberg, has collected about $60,000 just in the few hours since her tired rant. Us "Anti-American" associates of Barack Obama are doing what we can to make sure she has a bad election night.

In other news, the LA Times, the Chicago Tribune, and the Denver Post have all given Senator Obama their endorsement. The Trib endorsement is especially of note, as its history and the history of the Republican party are intertwined. This is the first time that the paper has ever endorsed a Democrat. My how the Republican party has fallen.

Click Here to support Elwyn Tinklenberg

Click Here to support Barack Obama

A fun, if pointless, diversion

This is nothing more than a fun diversion, but it is interesting nonetheless.

Cheer up, Senator McCain. At Least Burkina Faso and the former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia is pulling for you.

Sadly, expect too many Americans to revel in the fact that they support the candidate that the rest of the world isn't too keen on.

More on that Republican Nuttiness about ACORN

My fellow readers, here is some more defense against the dark arts of Karl Rove and his Fox minions. Please use this, as well the link in my earlier post to defend against any Fox News bs that friends, co-workers, or relatives might blather.

They come at you with ACORN? Use the facts.
They come at you with Ayers? Use the facts (including mentioning G. Gordon Liddy).
They come at you with racist or OBUMMA IS A MUSLIN !!!1! crap? Do your best to keep from insulting them, and use the facts.

It is one thing if McCain was right on the issues. But he is not, and he knows it. The only way he can take this election is by spreading falsities about Senator Obama, by trying to rile up the low information Republicans and tamp down the enthusiasm of the Democratic supporters.

Don't let him and those who support him get away with this.

Thoughts on the Last Debate

Overall, the debate was a good one for Obama, and not nearly enough for McCain to start any sort of rally. Senator McCain got a good line about Bush off, but Obama pivoted pretty well off of it. The William Ayers farce was handled well by Obama, and he just wailed on McCain on the health care and education topics.

Independent voters appear to agree with this, giving Obama a comfortable margin over McCain after the debate. CBS had Obama 53% to McCain 22%, and CNN had Obama over McCain 58-31.

Thus begins the last chapter of this election cycle, the last stretch to that high holy day of democracy, election day. I hope to see you along the way, adding my own thoughts as we head there.

Siggghhhhhhh

The title says it all. I pity these close minded people, I really do. They won't accept common sense, and they are filled with cowardly hate and ignorance.

When the hell did the party of Abraham Lincoln and Robert M. LaFollette, the party of Teddy Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower become little more than a Klan rally? It is a dark time for the Grand Old Party, a dark time indeed.

Republicans: Just Frigging Nuts

This picture is of a Republican in a stupid squirrel suit attacking Harry Smith. Apparently it is part of the Republican strategy to take down Obama. Not by offering solutions or fielding reasonable candidates, but by bitching about ACORN. What is ACORN, you ask?


Yes folks, apparently the Republicans, the party who pretty much stole the election in 2000, and likely stole some votes in Ohio in 2004, are complaining about Mickey Mouse being registered to vote. I'm sure that a few errant registrations, many of which were marked as fraudulent by ACORN, explains why Obama has a sizable lead on John McCain.

Why, On a day where the Dow dropped another 700+ points, do the Republicans just want to talk about ACORN and Ayers? Because they have no other strategies to play. The Democrats consistently beat them on issues, so its up to Silly Season to take the opponent down. They figure if they stomp their feet hard enough about NOBAMA the TERRURIST, maybe they can reach the magic number of 270.

Hopefully people aren't buying it, are finally getting wise to the stupidity of the GOP's game. Hopefully people realize that the Republicans have lost touch with reality, and that it is time for real change.

My idealistic side hopes that this is correct. But my side that sat through 2004 and watched Karl Rove and his minions tear down John Kerry still makes me worried. Fortunately, Barack Obama is a much better candidate than Senator Kerry.

The List: 10 States to Watch on Nov. 4

Every Tuesday between now and November 4, we'll be putting out a list of 10 states to watch on Election Day.

10. West Virginia

Why it might be important

This state was one of the worst for Obama in the primary, but recent polls have shown a potential for victory here. The very fact Joe Biden is talking about a surprise in the state shows how far McCain has fallen since his post-convention bounce. If this isn't called quickly for McCain (or called early for Obama), expect a wonderful night for the junior senator from Illinois.

Why it might not be so important

Despite some promising polls, the road is probably still far too daunting for Obama to take this state. Although it might not be called immediately at 7:30, it probably will still be called fairly early for Senator McCain.

Direction: Rising

9. Wisconsin

Why it might be important

Despite polls showing the Badger State solidifying for Obama, McCain appears to still feel he has chance in this state. Although its middle of the pack closing time doesn't make it an early indicator, it could still point to the direction in which the night will conclude.

Why it might not be so important

If the polls slide more to Obama's favor, this state will probably move to the likely Obama list, instead of the lean Obama list. With so many indicator states closing before Wisconsin, it very likely will not be a key indicator to the night.

Direction: Falling

8. Missouri

Why it might be important

Missouri is a historical bellwether state. With only 1956 as the exception, Missouri has gone for the winner every year for a long time. For a while this appeared to be a safe McCain state, but Obama has made a push.

Why it might not be so important

McCain is still likely to take the Show-Me State, although excellent GOTV efforts in Kansas City and St. Louis might negate that effect. Like Wisconsin, Missouri is too late to be an early indicator.

Direction: Rising

7. Florida

Why it might be important

Its Florida, and its close. McCain can only win if he takes Florida and Ohio (plus other swing states), and the Sunshine State could be a prime indicator for the election.

Why it might not be so important

Unlike Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004, Obama has a path to victory that doesn't require this state (or Ohio). Getting it would be nice, but losing it wouldn't ruin his night (although it would not be good if Florida was called immediately.

Direction: Stagnant

6. Nevada

Why it might be important

Barring a major surprise in Oregon or Washington, Nevada is the farthest west swing state on the map. Whoever wins this state might find themselves the winner of the whole election. Polls are close here, and it is very possible all eyes will be on the Silver State come election night.

Why it might not be so important

Its late poll closing time will mean that it is very possible the election picture will already be cleared up by the time the results start rolling into Carson City.

Direction: Rising

5. Ohio

Why it might be important

Like Florida, this state is crucial for McCain if he wishes to move into 1600 Pennsylvania. If 2004 was any indicator, expect it to be very early in the morning Wednesday before results come in.

Why it might not be so important

If results don't come in until early on November 5, it is very possible the election could be decided before we know the result. As mentioned with Florida, Obama doesn't necessarily need Ohio to win this year, although we are sure he would love to take home the Buckeye State.

Direction: Stagnant

4. Colorado

Why it might be important

Along with the three states above it, Colorado was a state comfortably won by Bush in 2004. However, shifting demographics, changing circumstances, and a much better Democratic ground game have put this state in play. If Obama plays well here, this might be the state that puts him over 270.

Why it might not be so important

Like Nevada, Colorado's polls close much later than several of the other potential swing states. Thus, the election might be decided before Colorado can give its results.

Direction: Rising

3. North Carolina

Why it might be important

Who would have thought four years ago that the Democrats might have a shot in the Tarheel State? North Carolina closes earlier than many states, and could certainly be a major indicator for the night. Whatever the result, the very fact it is in play has to be a victory for Obama.

Why it might not be so important

The polls in Virginia will be closed sooner than the polls here. Thus, it might be Virginia's (or our #1 state) role to play as the early indicator state.

Direction: Rising

2. Virginia

Why it might be important

Virginia (along with Maryland and DC) gave Obama a commanding lead in the Democratic primary, and he is doing his best to make sure the Old Dominion goes blue on November 4. If this is called early for McCain, it might be the first ray of sunlight for his campaign. If it is called late (or called early for Obama), expect it to be a long night for the Republicans.

Why it might not be so important

McCain decides to concede the election, making the point moot. Otherwise, the only way Virginia becomes irrelevant is if the results take too long that other states put Obama over the top.

Direction: Stagnant

1. Indiana

Why it might be important

Although it is likely McCain will come out with a victory in the Hoosier State, it won't be without a fight. Obama has narrowed the gap here, and it could be an interesting night. Indiana is one of the first states to close, so what happens here could be a prime indicator.

Why it might not be so important

If it takes as long on November 4 to call this state as it did the Democratic primary, Indiana could be irrelevant.

Direction: Rising

Dear President Bush

Dear Mr. President,

Your Administration has been an abject failure. Your unnecessary wars, embarrassing cowboy diplomacy, and general dumbassery has secured your place at the bottom of our Presidential honor list. Hope you like it down there with Warren, Franklin P., James B. and Richard. Please enjoy the last few months of your tenure as this nation dips deeper and deeper into the financial muck. It is oh so bad you didn't get your wish to privatize social security.

Sincerely,

Andrew C. Tate

/Tumbleweeds Rolling By

Sorry for the gigantic lack over the summer and early fall. Unfortunately this exciting election season coincided with a move to a new job and state, and my posting has fallen down as a result. I can't promise anything, but I hope to have some stuff up on this election shortly.

Later,

Andrew

Waiting in anxiety for Gustav

I write the title knowing that while I'm safe and sound in St. Louis for the time being, the true feelings of anxiety lie with those who will actually experience the Category 3 storm or fled from it. I can't imagine what it must REALLY be like just waiting and hoping for the best, which you know won't be that good anyhow. 

I remember the night before Katrina made landfall. I had stayed up all night watching weather reports and following the media "hype"...I remember the genuinely eerie feeling of knowing that as I watched that swirling storm inch closer and closer on the map to the coast that something immensely bad was going to happen and many people were going to suffer and nothing could be done about it. 

I remember wringing my hands watching the CNN live coverage of checking people into the Superdome. The sky was getting dark and I wondered how on earth all those people would fit inside. I remember hearing about the people who didn't want to leave, or didn't think the storm was going to be that bad....and I remember thinking to myself that if I was there and had no way out, I'd rather start walking to get out than sit still. The feeling I felt was like knowing I was going to witness pure chaos...and it was surreal because I also knew I would never actually experience it. 

Thinking back on that night, I realize that my fascination and fear watching the coverage was because I had never seen anything like it before. At 18 years of age, I had never before felt such distress over something so destructive. I didn't "witness" when it made landfall; I had a doctors appointment early that day and ran some errands afterwards. I remember sitting in the parking lot of Target, switching radio stations trying to find some news. Of course, it is still fresh in the minds of many Americans that it was actually much worse than the worst outcome had predicted. 

Now back to the present day. I'm glad to hear, and actually so relieved to hear, that many people did heed the warnings to evacuate. I'm glad to see that maybe, just maybe, mistakes on action won't be repeated. 

Once again, as a nation, all we can do is watch, wait, and pray. 

And the Winner Is...

Joe Biden is the Democratic candidate to be the 47th Vice-President of the United States.

Biden is an interesting choice, as he brings experience to the Democratic ticket. His track record of speaking off-the-cuff is both an asset and a liability, but I'm sure he'll be on his best behavior for the campaign. 

The VP debate should certainly be interesting, especially if Mitt Romney is McCain's choice.

Let's bring on the Conventions and shift the campaign into overdrive!

Gold Medal to Chinese Publicity Disasters

With the 2008 Summer Olympics being held in Beijing, China pounced immediately on this opportunity to heighten their image as a country of peace, prosperity, and sportsmanship. All was going well for awhile and then...hilarity ensued.

Now I realize some people may not agree with me that these PR backfires are as funny as I find them but then again I appreciate the subtle (or not-so-subtle) irony of the situation. I'm not saying that every China-related media frenzy is worth a chuckle (lets not forget the tragic earthquakes and mudslides that occured) but for a country whose government is so hell bent on giving just the perfect image that they'll do ANYTHING to portray it just so....they've had almost everything come around full circle and covered internationally.

It all begin with the running of the torch; the beloved precursor to the actual Olympic events. This year, the torch was met with controversy as protests against the Chinese recognition of Tibet were held. As media swarmed over the on going struggle for Tibetan freedom (which, might I add, isn't necessarily a bad thing) the Chinese government and the Olympic Committee did their best to, well, ignore any relevance to the issue at all, giving themselves a sort of double standard as the Olympic games drew near. This mindset seemed to say "sure, we oppress people in their own native land...but enough about that! Let's put focus back on the Olympics, a true show of humanity and peace, which China is a blossoming example of!"

Thats not really what I find funny though. It starts the way, but in truth its simply world politics at work...and really, theres not that much that even I find hilarious about that.

A few days ago, however, as the Olympics were finally underway the world was met with breaking news; the little darling who sang her heart out in the Opening Ceremony was not, in fact, the actual singer at all. No, the real 7 year old girl who sang was deemed "not cute enough" by a panel of "officials". Basically, this little girl was told she wasn't good enough to represent the image of China and thus a much more agreeable looking child was found to lip-sync. Interviewed later, the snubbed singer Yang Peiyi told China Central Television that "just having her voice used was an honor"...perhaps another attempt at covering this up? In case anyone is wondering, Peiyi doesn't look like the child of Frankenstein; the picture of her in an AP article about the situation showed a cute, bubbly, chubby faced little girl...the kind of little kid that any audience would eat up just as much as they did with the pig tailed Lin Miaoke. Of course, theres going to be those people who say "Westerners don't understand. It's more important that the most beautiful child represent the country that China is trying to portray" simply because they're butthurt over such shallow narcissism...Westerners wouldn't understand? The whole Western hemisphere is obsessed with body image and unreasonable standards of beauty, and even the media still made a big deal out of this child getting the double standard. Way to go China PR, if epic fail was an olympic sport, perhaps you'd have even more gold medals to show off.

Last, but not least, anyone who has watched the womens gymnastics knows what I'm about to touch on....China has two competitors, both said to be 16, whom all were skeptical about. Seriously, you can't tell us that those girls are 16. Even the Chinese media reported on earlier news documentation within the past year claiming both girls to be 13 and 14, respectively. However, the Olympic Committee has given a simple answer; the government-provided passports claim them to be 16, therefore, they must be 16. This is funny to me an absurd sort of way, since fake legal documents MUST be out of the question, despite those things floating around known as FACTS.

So what have we learned from the perfect nation that is China? Douchebaggery is acceptable as long as you have one document saying it is and you are pretty enough to present it. The spirit of humble sportsmanship lives on!

Is John McCain the Anti-Christ?

Almost assuredly not, and neither is Barack Obama.

To bring foolishness like that into the election picture is something you might expect from half-brained morons and crazy fundies. However, a supposedly objective and legitimate news channel doing that just goes to show how far CNN has fallen.

You used to be cool, CNN. Nowadays, you make MSNBC look like Edward Freaking R. Murrow, and they spend half their time on shows about pederasts and prisons (No, I'm not talking about you, Mr. Matthews). You've become nothing more than a sad empty shell of your former self, a pathetic copy-cat of Faux News.

Please do yourselves a favor and replace 2/3 of your news coverage with Sham-Wow infomercials. It will be more relevant to the news, and the American people will be spill-free, and thus happier.
Also, great job with that stupid headline for your ticker. It would help if you would mention that the person calling it an economic disaster was Senator John "I don't know shit about the economy" McCain.

Senator Clinton to be placed into nomination at the convention

Looks like Senator Clinton will be placed into nomination alongside Presumptive nominee Obama.

As anyone who has followed this blog can attest, I am not a big fan of Senator Clinton. Her campaign was at times embarrassing, and at other times mean-spirited. She seemed far too interested in making the campaign about her, and her followers have often been unbearable.

However, I have no problem with her name being put into nomination at the convention. The Obama campaign appears to be on board with this move, which is reason enough for me to believe it is a wise course of action. It will give her supporters one last chance to show her their support, and will give an excellent opportunity for her to pivot her support fully over to Senator Obama.

If this happens, it will be completely in the hands of Obama's campaign. There isn't any conspiracy to derail his nomination, at least not in the minds of any rational person. Only the craziest of her (and Obama's) supporters believe some coup will take place if she is entered for nomination. Trust me, it is nothing but formality and ceremony. It will be a nice appetizer to set up for the big feast on Thursday.

War & Peace 2: War Harder

The Evil Empire is Back! Yay!

I certainly can't wait until 2065, when the grandson of an early 21st century Russian plutocrat writes a sweeping epic about Emperor Vladimir the Soulful and his imperial struggles against Grumpoleon McCain. That is, assuming there is still a Russia, plutocrats, and humans in 2065.

The 2012 Overture will be pretty cool as well, only with baby nukes instead of cannons.

This is brought to you by WITF out of Harrisburg, PA. WITF indeed.

In all seriousness, the rollback of democratic reforms in Russia in the Putin years are disheartening, and Russia does seem interested in throwing its weight in the region. However, unless Putin plans on taking back Alaska from the U.S., restoring the house of Bourbon to the throne of France, or marrying off a daughter to Prince William, I really think the Soviet analogy works better. Calling upon Imperial Russia as a comparison makes you look old and confused, an impression that really does not help you out.

Up Next: McCain discusses the appalling auto-gyro service to Siam, and offers his personal memories of the War of the Spanish Succession.

Obama's V.P. is...

Not yet announced!

Sorry for that, but I just wanted to give you fair readers (all 1.3 of you) the same feeling I got when I received an email from Obama campaign manager David Plouffe yesterday. The campaign is announcing the Vice Presidential selection via text messages and email, and they wanted all of us supporters to sign up to be the first ones to know.

This is an interesting strategy, and probably means a V.P. announcement is imminent. When I get that "super-secret" email, I'll be sure to let you know who the choice is.

An Open Letter to Middle America

Dear Middle America,

It's time to wake up and smell the coffee, good citizens of the area derisively called "fly-over country". The Republican power-brokers hold you in contempt, and find you to be ignorant trolls who eat whatever is fed to you.

Evidence Item A

Apparently people from other countries being interested in an American presidential candidate is a downside to electability. Because everybody knows the only good leader is one who pisses off the Germans.

McCain's camp is putting this shit out there to make them seem all "man of the people". That should be a hard thing to do for a man who is the son and grandson of admirals and married into one of the richest families in Arizona. I'm sure all of you can relate to his bargain-basement shoe selections (only $500!).

Please wake up, and realize that the Republicans don't give a shit about you, unless you have a trust fund, are a CEO, or have thousands of faithful Christians at your command. It might be true that the Democrats don't give a shit either, but they certainly have an economic plan much friendlier to you. Think about this the next time some asshole CEO closes down a factory in your rust belt town so he can cash another bonus check, or your aunt is denied treatment for her chronic medical condition.

Sincerely,

Andrew C. Tate

Huzzah! It's a Bush Biopic!

Seriously, Why and WTF?

This movie looks like a steaming pile of buffalo dung. There is an impressive cast list for this piece of crap, yet it looks like it will be only entertaining in a "so bad it's good" kind of way. Basically it will be like the Bush Administration.

Good call on casting Richard Dreyfuss as Dick Cheney. His first portrayal of our grouchy asshole of a vice-president under the thinly disguised name Bob Rumson in The American President was top-notch.

Brilliant Move, Senator McCain

Great move, Senator McCain. Challenging Senator Obama to make an international visit is working so well for you. It's not like the rest of the world loves the idea of President Obama.

Lovely move, scheduling that press conference on a oil rig, and canceling due to a freaking hurricane. You'll be such a wonderful President.

Seriously, why is this even close? McCain and his campaign is acting like they want to lose, and Obama is looking very Presidential on his trip. Yet the polls are still very close. This leads to a couple of possible theories.

1. We are a nation of ignorant morons.

2. Only die-hards and masochists pay attention to the campaigns prior to the conventions.

Although I won't discount theory #1, theory #2 is probably the biggest answer (and the less depressing). If this keeps up after Denver and St. Paul, McCain will likely go the way of Barry Goldwater.

Obama's Meager Haul

I must say that it doesn't feel very good when my $25 donation makes up about half of the candidates haul for a mon....

Oh, $52 Million, not $52?

Thanks, CNN. Really, you guys do a bang-up job with those headlines.

How a Bill Becomes Law, the Bush Administration Edition

1. President Bush outlays some absolutely ridiculous plan, using magic elves and giant favors to his buddies in Texas, to solve a problem his administration played a role in worsening. He explains it to us like we are all kindergartners, despite the fact that he clearly shows little understanding of what he is saying.

2. Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid stop their feet, say we won't stand for this, and we'll defend the public.

3. There is some debate on the bill in Congress, and the Democrats do come up with a mostly reasonable bill that won't be an extreme rollover to the President.

4. President Bush refuses to sign a bill that doesn't look almost exactly like the one he feels meets the necessity for his "reality". Unfortunately, the reality of the Bush Administration is in no shape the same as the real one.

5. "Democrats" in the House and Senate get nervous, worrying about being challenged by a 3G Republican in their district or state, and beg Pelosi and Reid to back down.

6. The two parties "compromise". In other words, the Democrats get one or two minor concessions, assent to everything else the President wants, and call the bill a win-win scenario.

7. The bill passes the house by mostly partisan lines, and moves to the Senate.

8. A few senators will try to amend the bill, but it will be for naught. Trusty "Democrats" such as Lieberman, Mikulski, Landrieu, etc... will make sure no filibuster or actual debate occurs, and the bill passes with maybe one additional concession to the left.

9. Bush bitches about the concessions, and threatens to veto.

10. One of the concessions is removed, so President Bush will sign the bill.

11. President Bush signs the bill, but invalidates whatever displeases him by using signing statements as legal text, allowing him to do whatever the hell he wants.

12. Any problems generated directly from the passage of the bill, or those not solved by the bill, are blamed on the Democrats, who just can't keep from limiting the power of the Republicans. After all, the Republican party has no power whatsoever.

13. Some Democrats celebrate the "victory", and start bitching about their presidential candidate who wants to change things. Because the Democratic party is in such great shape, and doesn't need a change in attitude.

I sure hope you've enjoyed your unsullied skylines along the coastlines of America. Because coming soon will be oil wells, brought to you by Dubya and the oh-so-loyal opposition.

Wise Words from the Field

If you haven't already, I recommend that you put Al Giordano's The Field on your daily blog rotation. His reporting on this momentous election has been both entertaining and informative. Without he reasoned and tempered words, I am pretty sure I would be one of the biggest Chicken Littles out there.

His latest post, regarding the whole blow up on the left about Obama's vote on the imperfect FISA bill, is yet again an excellent piece of advice for us panicky political newbies. I disagree with Obama, although I can understand his motives. I don't think he is abandoning his principles on the matter, I just think he is doing what most politicians tend to do. He is making the best of a bad situation, and trying to keep the eye on the big prize.

I have no doubt that Senator Obama will be a much better President than Bush (or McCain) when it comes to obeying the Constitution. For the first time in a long time we might actually have a President who believes in and works to preserve the cherished balance of power that makes our system of government operate fully. Nothing he has done so far shows him to be anything but an intelligent, honorable person who will use reason and facts, instead of beliefs and dogma, to make decisions as our country's leader.

I wish he had still voted no yesterday on the FISA bill, but I can see some advantages in the political arithmetic for him to vote yes. It isn't as if he was the driving force behind this lackluster bill, he was just a high profile senator voting on it. Like it or not, there are a fair amount of Democrats who don't stand united with their left-leaning colleagues on this issue, and no amount of wrangling by Obama (or Feingold, Durbin, Dodd, etc...) on the issue was going to get those senators to change their mind. Most of the Democrats who voted for this bill in both houses of Congress will still be there in January, and it would be helpful to create some political capital. After all, the next President will have some tough battles to fight.

When you disagree with Senator Obama, the best way to enact change isn't to threaten to take your ball and go home. Its to get organized, and take it to the people. Make it as difficult as possible for Senator Obama to ignore your voice, without taking your eye of the big picture. Understand that Obama isn't a die-hard left-winger, and that sometimes he might listen to those who disagree with you as well. And above all, realize that Senator Obama is still a much better alternative to Senator McCain.

To paraphrase his famous 2004 convention speech, we are neither red states nor blue states, but the United States of America. We are a diverse nation, full of people who fall across the entire political spectrum. We shouldn't be so concerned about ideological purity as we should about figuring out what works, and what creates a society that is both free, prosperous, and effective.

Jesse Helms dead at 86

Former Senator Jesse Helms has died. As I am a firm believer of saying nothing ill of the dead, I will not say much about this man at this time. However, a couple of points:

1. Reverend Grahm, comparing Mr. Helms to intellectual greats such as John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, or even James Monroe is an insult to those men. 

2. I am very sorry that Mr. Helms won't see Barack Obama elected president in November. 

Obama on Patriotism

If you haven't already checked this out, here is Obama's speech on Patriotism that he gave on Monday. I'm sure its likely you haven't heard much about it, because the media seems far too concerned about kissing John McCain's ass and bitching about Wes Clark being such a jackass by telling the truth.

It's just as compelling speech as Obama's "More Perfect Union" speech he gave during the whole Wright BS storm. It once again shows why Obama is not the typical candidate, and why he should be our next President.

Also, check out this wonderful analysis by Al Giordano at The Field. It is a wonderful post, and truly brings up some good points for those on the left who are panicking about Obama's "perceived" move to the center (present company included).

An Open Letter to the Guy Sitting at the Next Table Over During Lunch

Dear Sir,

I couldn't help but overhear your conversation with your lunch companion yesterday. I could go on a long spiel about your crazy ramblings, but instead I'll keep it short and sweet.

Your xenophobic and racist rants are just one more reason I hope Senator Obama wins in November. I can't imagine how much trouble it will cause you to see Obama in the White House, but I'm sure it will be plenty.

I hope devoted Muslims move to your neighborhood. Heck, I hope your grandchildren marry a damn dirty "furner", just to piss you off. Change is the one constant in this world, and it is better to embrace it, rather than stick your feet in the mud and come off as some small-minded, hateful asshole.

Fundamentalist Islam is not going to topple the United States. The death of democracy in the United States, if it ever comes, will not be done by non-Christians, illegal immigrants, or them damn dirty Red Commie Pinkos. It will come about holding the Bible in its right hand, a stock report in its left hand, and the American flag draped around its neck. Its friend will be Xenophobia and Ignorance, and will mislead the justified desire for protecting heritage and tradition to betray its innocence and purity.

A change is gonna come, good sir, and I suggest you should learn to accept that. It will make your life much more enjoyable.

Best Wishes,

Andrew C. Tate

Vandalism for America's Future

After reading a recent story about vandels spray-painting anti-Obama messages on vehichles in Orlando my initial reaction was simply: "Seriously?"

When I found out these taggers were Clinton supporters, no doubt still bitter and delusional about her loss of the Democratic nomination, I nearly laughed (imagining angry baby boomers and grandmothers tagging everything within reach). Then I realized how sad of a situation it actually was. Not sad on the level of heart-breaking; rather, sad as in how the bystander can see blatent ignorance and downright stupidity. Pathetic acts that make you shake your head and say "man...those guys are stupid!"

I'm not going to preach about the evils of tagging, because frankly, I don't care. (While living in Orlando area myself for awhile, I was once invited to "go tag some stuff" which was an offer I did refuse)What gets me is the fact that this was childish political vandelism in a period where true supporters would be closing their wounds and shaking hands with fellow Democrats. Now, I realize that (regrettably) not everyone with the right to vote may have the brain capacity to do so wisely. I'm not saying that the die-hard Hillary supporters are all an ignorant mass. What I am saying is that these few individuals felt it necessary to lash out for no good reason.

In a campaign that is, even if its understated, expressing a more open-minded nation that would work to unite instead of divide, its little things like this that are just embarrassing. One is embarassed for them.

Now, on the other hand, I'm going to stop sensationalizing this one story. It's done with. I have one last thing to say:

Democrats of Orlando, unite in your beliefs, unite in your canidates, and share peace and good tidings over a hot plate of loaded fries at the Ale House in the name of brotherhood.

Campaign Commercial Corner: As Minnesotan as Lutefisk, Dontchaknow?

Although I hope Al Franken kicks Norm Coleman out of his Senate seat, I do have to give his campaign credit for this. It is pretty funny, although possibly not in the way they intended.

(BTW, this ad is in response to the speculation about the digital insertion of Norm's wife in this ad.)

Of course, the biggest thing I get from both that ad, and this ad by Gordon Smith:



Is that it certainly isn't cool to stand by President Bush this year. In fact, it is pretty crazy that Smith would have an ad touting his ability to work with Senator Obama. I guess John McCain really is a maverick for sticking by all those policies that Bush has supported.

Anonymous No More

In the interest of fairness and to show that I stand by my words, I have decided to remove my anonymity. All of my posts, on this and my other blogs, will now have my name as the author.

There isn't anything wrong with anonymity, especially in regards to political debate. Keeping the parties anonymous allows for their statements to be taken at face value, rather than filtered through the skewed perspective of preconceived notions about the author. Whether it was Mrs. Silence Dogood and Richard Saunders, or Publius, or even Anonymous, anonymity has helped better inform our country.

However, I want to make sure that the words I write represent what I believe in. When you see a post from Andrew C. Tate, you know that it from me. This will force me to be better at giving my arguments, prevent me from resorting to cheap attacks, and help me become a better writer.

I stand by what I write here, and will be glad to discuss it with anybody who disagrees with me. That is why we have comments open on this blog, and that is why I have made my email address available. If you wish to remain anonymous, that is your prerogative. However, feel free to drop that anonymity at any time.

FISA Revisited

I must admit that I was not feeling especially cheerful yesterday, and the result was a barely coherent screed about the FISA "compromise", specifically the immunity part.

Since then, Senator Obama has released his statement, one that while not exactly praising the bill, isn't a fierce "pure" indictment that many progressives wish he would give. 

I must say I am mildly disappointed in Senator Obama, and disagree with his supporting this weak-ass compromise. However, it's not going to stop me from supporting his campaign, and shouldn't stop any person truly committed to changing the system in Washington.

Sometimes compromise means swallowing a bad pill. While the new FISA bill isn't perfect, it does have some provisions that might restore the rule of law over the executive branch. In fact, if the damn thing didn't include retroactive immunity for giant telecoms, I doubt few people would be getting in a tizzy over this.

Although there is certainly an issue regarding privacy and civil rights, the biggest issue is the excusing of corporate complicity with illegal acts. What makes them so certain that excusing AT&T and Verizon this time won't result in the companies over-stretching  the boundaries of law next time?

I know there are some political issues here, and that sometimes you have to make a bad choice. The Democrats clearly felt threatened by the potential issue the Republicans might make Obama has certainly done enough during the primaries to gain some trust, and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt here. After all, the Senate hasn't even voted yet, and maybe he has something up his sleeve.

If one expects purity in a decision made by the government of a pluralistic republic, one will most often be disappointed. Compromise is the nature of a republic, and the pursuit of the good cannot be scrapped in favor of chasing the perfect.

I just wish I could feel more confident that Obama was on the right side here.

UPDATE: Here is a comment from Wonkette that is as good of an analogy as I can see for this situation.

All Hail AT&T, our glorious leader of Congress

Not surprisingly, the Democratic leadership is showing their true colors on the calamity that is the FISA renewal bill. As the August deadline looms, Steny Hoyer and the rest of the chicken-shit democratic leadership will roll over once again to the White House, fix a few typos in the bill, and call it a "compromise".

You know, there was a time when balance of power, checks and balances, and party leadership in Congress meant something. But apparently that is no longer true. Steny Hoyer and Pelosi act like they are still in the minority, allowing President Bush and his gang of incompetent tools to run roughshod over our constitution. I'd blame the cowardly Blue Dog Democrats (why are you even Democrats anymore?), but its the job of leadership to get them to fall in line.

Lyndon Johnson wouldn't let Congress turn into mewling kitten afraid of the wrath of Mr. 30%. Neither would Congressional legends from the other side of the aisle. At one time, Congress actually believed that it was equal to the White House, like the Constitution proclaims.
Not any more.

Although there are many problems with the bill, letting a compromise through that gives telecommunication giants even an iota of retroactive protection for screwing with our civil liberties is irresponsible. It doesn't erase 9/11, and does nothing to prevent another tragedy of that magnitude. All it does it help out Ma Bell and prevent justice from ever being served.

I'm sure those checks from San Antonio are really nice, aren't they Speaker Pelosi and Mr. Hoyer?

(Note: Harry Reid and the Senate Democrats deserve some blame as well. However, given their majority is built only when Joe Lieberman is part of the caucus, it is understandable why they can't get anything done. It doesn't excuse their cowardice in the face of more cowardly Democrats, but it does save them from my harsh invective.)

An Open Letter to Mr. Fred Hobbs, Round Two

Dear Mr. Hobbs,

After reading about your apology for your comments you made regarding Presumptive Democratic Nominee Obama, I have just one simple piece of advice. It's a simple piece of information that all intelligent people seem to have taken to heart by now. Ok, here it is:

UNLESS IT RELATES TO SOME STUPID DRUGGED-UP HOTEL HEIRESS, DON'T USE FAUX NOISE AS YOUR SOURCE OF FACTS!!!

Faux Noise is nothing but the WWE of news. It isn't even really infotainment, its pure spectacle masquerading as infotainment. It is full of nothing but assholes like Hannity and O'Reilly who are hired to make old white people feel good about themselves, and pass the blame off to them Commie pinko islamoterrocommunohomofascist sympathizers known as lih-bur-ulls. The few "balanced" commentators that they do have are some of the worse straw-men ever to come out of the Democratic party (See Colmes, Alan and new hire Davis, Lanny).

If you like watching Bush propaganda and neo-cons strutting around laughing at such petty things such as "facts" and "The Constitution", Faux Noise is for you. If your idea of hard hitting news is hypocritical reports on Spring Break (How dare these kids wear revealing clothing. We are sooo mad, we'll show pictures of these kids next to our outraged faces), or keeping up with the latest trainwreck of a starlet, than this is your network. If you want real news that speaks truth to power, and respects the responsibility of informing our nation's citizens, look elsewhere. (A Hint: CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC aren't really the answers either)

It's nice to hear that you finally realized that maybe you should verify facts before spouting your mouth off next time, and I hope that this is the start on the road to recovery. Maybe next week you'll realize that the nice man on the AOL from Nigeria is trying to scam you.

Sincerely,

Augustprairie

The Field Eruption Explained

Al Giordano has put up an explanation of what went down with his hasty departure from Rural Votes. As I suspected, it was a combination of an over-reaction by a advocacy group about a non-issue post and an absolutist who felt hurt and betrayed by the censoring of his written piece.

I must preface my opinion with the note that I really am not sure who Saul Alinsky was. The post that caused the level 3 crap-storm doesn't seem too out of the ordinary in my opinion, and does seem to touch on some good points about the grassroots movement that Obama has used so well.

I'm not sure who those so-called donors are that get so panicked about some blog post that mentions Saul Alinsky. Apparently the brave way of handling political hot potatoes is censorship and conceding to Faux Noise talking points, instead of hitting them head-on.

It would be one thing if Al Giordano had proposed blowing up dams, or leading violent protests at meetings of international leaders. Had he advocated following the rules set forth in Mao's Little Red Book, I would have left immediately. But the rules he set forth in that post, as radical as they may have been in 1970, sure as shit weren't too radical these days. Hell, I recognize a bunch of them being used by sleaze such as Karl Rove or Mark Penn, not exactly known as radical leftist activists.

Deb at Rural Votes biggest mistake was panicking without waiting for a reply from the author. Its too bad that she seemed to place rich donors ahead of those who gave in small amounts (including yours truly), most of whom apparently had no issue with this non-starter of a controversy.

By jumping the gun and getting nervous, she set forth a path of ruin that lost her site a popular writer, sullied the name of a group that is truly trying to do something important, and made sure many previously loyal supporters will do otherwise. Not exactly the best model of successful advocacy, is it?

Offshore Drilling is not the Solution

This morning, President Bush laid out his argument that we should lift the ban on offshore drilling. He will argue that this will assist in making our nation energy independent, and help alleviate the pressure at the gas pumps. Obviously, as this is the Bush administration, neither will likely happen.

First off, opening offshore drilling won't mean that oil will be available immediately. It takes time and considerable investment to set up the offshore oil platforms. It is unlikely any appreciable amount of oil would be obtained until around the next Presidential election. Although that might be nice to have four or five years from now, it does little to solve the current issue.

Second, it wouldn't be a viable long term strategy. If we sucked the shelf dry of the oil we could reach (without it rising to some ungodly level like $500/barrel), it still would only supply us for a few years. After that we would still be looking towards more expensive and more risky ventures, or look into nasty "solutions" such as oil shale.

I know that the argument goes that we should drill offshore (and in Anwar) as a short term solution, while we work on alternative fuel solutions. However, I've yet to see Bush, Cheney, McCain, and his oil business cronies put forth a plan for a true alternative fuel plan. The way this administration has run itself, and their buddies have run their companies, requires me to take a "show me" attitude.

We have a moment here, a point where we can rise above the mediocrity of years past. Why not call for a Apollo Program to solve our energy issue? It would be good for our economy, great for our environment, and gives the boomers a shot at leaving one true legacy before they head off to snowbird country.

Sure alternative fuels as they exist today have their downsides. The cost of using them may be too prohibitive given the benefit, and the technology may be unreliable. As anyone who has bought a computer or HDTV knows, that is the case with all technology. Given time, resources, and ingenuity, all of these problems can be fixed.

Like all things in life, the government should not be in alone in leading this effort. Its best role is in pooling resources and connecting the various wings of our society with each other to maximize our potential. Although there will certainly be government based researchers involved in solving this issue, most of the work will come from our vast network of universities, not-for-profit organizations, and companies. Even those of us who are not engineers, chemists, or researchers will play a role, doing our part to use energy efficiently and offering our own ideas to those who will listen.

I understand the desire to lower gas prices. Gas prices this high are terribly inconvenient, and in some cases can ruin the livelihood of some people. However, that is just a sign that something should be done, and the sooner the better. But if we are going to fix this, it is best to fix it right. That way we won't have to come back 20 years from now and start again at the same place.

Democratic Veep Watch

Here is the August Prairie semi-educated Veep Watch Rankings. As usual, all predictions are guaranteed, or you get your money back.

Frontrunners

1. Kathleen Sebelius

2. Brian Schweitzer

3. Tim Kaine

4. Evan Bayh

Middle of the Pack

5. Jim Webb

6. Bill Richardson

Longshots

7. John Edwards

8. Hillary Clinton

9. Christopher Dodd

10. Wesley Clark

11. Russ Feingold

12. Ed Rendell

No Chance in Hell

13. Al Gore

14. Chuck Hagel

Hillary Clinton probably would have been in the middle of the pack until it was announced that Patti Solis-Doyle had been hired by Obama to be the as yet unnamed VP candidate's chief of staff. It is unlikely that her hiring would be a good sign for the "dream ticket" die hards.

I know there are some hopeless dreamers falling in love with an Obama/Hagel ticket, but that just won't happen. Hagel is a very conservative Republican who would not mesh with the Obama campaign. I know he has been a vocal critic of the Bush adminstration in regards to Iraq, but there are plenty of qualified Democrats that fit that profile as well.

Al Gore Officially Endorses Senator Obama

Although it is somewhat irrelevant at this point, now that the race for the nomination is over, Vice-President and Emperor of the Moon Al Gore has decided to publicly endorse Senator Obama.

Although I would have loved to see Gore's endorsement before the end of the hoopla, I'm certain he was just playing smart politics. After all, look at what happened when Gore endorsed Dean in 2004.

Doing it now, in this relative dead zone between the primaries and the conventions, generates excitement and buzz for the Obama campaign, and reinvigorates the Obama community.

Lets just hope he doesn't take Obama riding on the moon worms.

Rural Votes tills up the Field

Today I discovered that Al Giordano, the writer of the blog known as "The Field", had vacated his space at Rural Votes and move his blog here. That explains a lot, as I was wondering what had happened to his blog (and why they were cross-posting their other blog).

From the sound of it, Giordano left because Rural Votes censored a post of his referencing Saul Alinksy. While they are certainly in their right to do that, they shouldn't do that, as it just isn't good blogging (or journalistic) policy.

Like all controversies involving censorship that leads to firings or resignations, it isn't so much the act that puzzles me as the cover-up. You can't access old material at the old site, and no comments related to the issue appear to be getting through their approval. They are basically acting like nothing happened, sending his posts down the memory hole.

It is that type of behavior that takes simple content differences to a place that gets me very annoyed. ESPN did this with Gregg Easterbrook after he made some really stupid comments about Michael Eisner. It isn't so much his getting canned by ESPN that pissed me off, but their lack of acknowledging what happened, or even acknowledging he had been a contributor to Page 2.

I'm withholding judgment until I get the other side of the story. But if that never happens, I must say that I will be disappointed in Rural Votes.

Tim Russert Dead at 58

Sad news from Washington, as NBC Washington Bureau Chief Tim Russert has died of an apparent heart attack. This campaign won't be the same without him.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to his family.

An Open Letter to Mr. Fred Hobbs

WARNING: Naughty language is to be found past this point. If your virginal eyes can't handle it, here is a link more your speed.

..............................................................................













LAST CHANCE FOR LOLCATS






OK, I warned you....


Dear Mr. Fred Hobbs,
123 Moran Lane
Idiotville, TN 12345


After reading your comments regarding the Democratic Nominee for President, I have just one thing to say to you.

Go fuck yourself.

Seriously, go fuck yourself. There is no room for this kind of crap in our political world, and certainly not within your own party. That isn't productive talk, and it certainly isn't respectful of the presumptive nominee for the Democratic party.

I'd ask you why you are in the Democratic party, but that kind of crap should be too stupid for even 3G Republicans to parrot (not that they won't, but the point still stands). It is one thing to hear this absolute drivel from people who aren't part of the Democratic party organization, but a State party Executive Committee member?

If you disagree with Senator Obama's policy proposals, or campaign strategy, or political theories, it is absolutely OK to disagree with them. Senator Obama would be one of the first to admit that he doesn't hold a monopoly over good ideas, and his brand of politics is built upon you getting involved. Discourse and debate are the bedrock upon which a stable democracy sits. And if you don't like the direction your party is going, you are more than free to leave and join the GOP, the Libertarians, the Greens, or even start your own party.

However, repeating crap that is so obviously true because you saw it on your AOL email sent by Cousin Merle that says BARAK HUSSAYNE OBAMMA = TERRORIST!!!!1! is not acceptable. It is demeaning to you, makes those you supposedly represent look bad, and does nothing but damage the cause to which you supposedly are devoted.

Knowledge is Power, folks. Emails, especially those sent via 50 forwards, are worse than Weekly World News and Wikipedia in regards to getting your facts (unless the facts you are looking for are about Bat-Boy or Scrooge McDuck). Believe them at your own peril, just like the ones from the Nigerian business man or hotstuffff69@yahoo.com who can show you how to MAKE YOuR PENIS LARRGE!!!!!!!!!!1!

Very Unhappily Yours,

augustprairie

This is why he should be President: Reason #5,253,353

Here is a blog post by Senator Obama from 2005, following the appointment of Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts. It clearly states Obama's vision for the Democratic party, and our nation. He took a lot of flack from the progessives in the Democratic party for this, but he clearly shows he is his own man, and truly represents a chance to remove ourselves from the gutter of Clinton/Bush/Rove politics.

Of course, Roberts has turned out to be a true friend of Bushism, but sometimes you just have to give the benefit of the doubt. In the long run, that attitude will win out, even if it loses some battles.

Lord Cheney, your Shuttle Awaits

Ugghhh

Look, I'm not exactly what one would call a McCain supporter. Sure, I supported him against Dubya in the 2000 primary, but that was at a different time, with a different type of campaign. Then McCain decided to cozy up to crazy jackasses like Jerry Falwell and Bob Jones (the fundie, not the former mayor of Danville). His pandering to these sleazebags, combined with his dogged support of the mess in Iraq, ruined much of what lingering respect I had for him.

Of course as time has gone on, it appears that Senator McCain isn't much of a maverick. Sure, he played an excellent underdog in 2000, and he has taken some stances that are unpopular with the 3G (Guns, God, and teh Gayz) wing of the Republican party. But the vast majority of his votes right in step with the President's agenda, including issues where he previously had some integrity (torture).

Anybody who supports giving Dick Cheney any role in his administration should not be President. Cheney is nothing but a war profiteer with an overly powerful office, hell bent on bringing our nation back to the muck that was the Nixon administration. He has consistently abused his power as Vice President, and created an office that appears to be above the law. Granted, the absolutely disgusting lack of Congressional oversight by his GOP Senate buddies from 2001-2006, and a lack of mandate by the Democrats since then has helped him be so arrogant. However, he still has shown a serious contempt for the balance of powers, exerting to an extent that none of our other Administrations (Nixon excepted) dared to attempt.

If John McCain really was a maverick, a straight talker, he would say unconditionally that Dick Cheney should retire from public service. But he won't, because he is no maverick. Inexplicably, a large portion of the GOP base still considers this guy a hero, despite the fact that any Democrat who tried to exert his power would automatically be labeled a "Ruthless Traitor to Democracy" (and rightly so) by the right.

At least Cheney disagreed with McCain over his laughable "Gas Tax Holiday" idea. Even if Cheney is nothing but a close ally of the oil industry, he was right on that one. I guess it just goes to show even a broken watch is right twice a day.

NOTE: Yes I'm aware the article talks about the complicated issue that McCain has with Cheney. I'm also aware that the McCain quote is from 2006, although Cheney was just as foul in 2006 as 2008. My point is that McCain ain't the "liberal" the right wing claims him to be. Just another reminder for you confused Clinton supporters and indecisive Indepedent voters.

Hey, That's Just Richard Nixon's List

Before I read this article, I was more than willing to give Senator Clinton the benefit of the doubt. But now I can see that things never change, and she and Bill are just the same old vindictive Clintons. An honest-to-god shit list? That is something Richard Nixon would do.

Throughout her campaign, she showed some disconcerting signs that the secretive imperial presidency of Mister Nixon and Bush would be very similar to a Clinton White House. Her White House would value loyalty or competency, something that has worked horribly the past seven years. Transparency would not be a priority, and she would be most comfortable using some of the disgusting precedents set by President Bush and his pit bull Cheney.

Although it is possible that Senator Obama might be taking us for a ride, and is just as willing to be an imperial president as our current one, it doesn't seem likely. Senator Obama has clearly shown time and time again he is cool, rational, and not prone to decade long vendettas. I don't believe the Senators or Representatives who supported Clinton are a shit list somewhere in Chicago. He just seems smart enough to realize that creating vendettas and going after revenge is neither productive nor what he was elected to do.

I am pretty sure I remember hearing that one of Senator Clinton's favorite books was Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin. The book, which covers Abraham Lincoln and his contentious and compromised cabinet, shows Lincoln to be a fair-minded man who realized that grudges and vendettas just don't work. By her actions, Senator Clinton has shown herself to be less similar to Lincoln, and more like the scheming Salmon P. Chase.

History has shown that loyalty can at times be a bad thing, when that loyalty is given to incompetent people. It has also shown that vendettas and grudges can ultimately harm both those who hold the grudge and the cause they are supposedly devoted to championing. Obviously the Clintons are not very astute students of history.

You mean there are more states than OH and FL?

Even though the two states mentioned above will still be important states this fall, Senator Obama and his Democratic Party are rolling out a strategy that is unprecedented in this day and age. According to emails I have received from the campaign, they will be putting staff in all 50 states, something that hasn't been done in a generation.

Although the campaign (nor I) expect them to win in all 50 states, or even come close in many, it still is comforting to know that they are attempting to grow the party. Yes, Virginia, there are Democrats in Kansas and Utah. For too long the Democratic party has yielded far too much ground to the Republicans, and the result has been terrible defeats at the ballot box.

When Howard Dean became chairman of the DNC, he implemented a 50 state strategy. During that time, the Democrats have made significant gains across the country. This, coupled with a candidate who believes in a nationwide Democratic party, and not just an urban Democratic party, may be a sign of great things to come.

Note: VP Watch Delayed until Next Week

Due to the absence of one of the contributors to August Prairie, we will be delaying the second Democratic and first Republican VP watch posts until next Tuesday and Wednesday. We apologize for the delay.

Thank You, Senator Clinton

Thank you, Senator Clinton. Your hard fought campaign has made Senator Obama a better campaigner. Rest assured your issues will not be ignored.

To those of you in her crowd who booed Barack Obama, we'll be waiting for you when you come to your senses. When that happens, I promise to hold no hard feelings. It's time to take it to John McCain, and we would really appreciate your help.

John McCain Steals from Obama

Looks like Senator McCain and his campaign can't help but steal from Senator Obama. First it was his slogan, replacing "Change you can believe in" with "A Leader we can believe in". Then he decided to change his website to be awfully similar to Senator Obama's. Finally, he decided that Senator Obama's logo would be a nice thing to copy.

Looks awfully similar (although admittedly different in other ways as well) to Senator Obama's:


They say copying is the sincerest form of flattery, but I would like it if McCain would go further. Maybe steal Obama's plan to restore America's foreign image, or his commitment to upholding Roe v. Wade. I wouldn't hold my breath on that.

And then there was one (Democrat)

After her attempt to muscle Senator Obama into quickly naming her his running mate failed, Senator Clinton has finally faced facts. During her inconclusive speech on Tuesday night, it appeared she might be in this for much longer than it appears now. However, her tune changed once her closest supporters started appealing to her to rethink her position. This, combined with another flood of superdelegates to Obama, and a brilliant decision by Obama to name Caroline Kennedy to his VP search committee yesterday, led to where we are now.

Everyone who has read this blog knows I have had issues with Senator Clinton's campaign. Some of the tactics used by her camp have been downright odious. However, she certainly knows what she is talking about, is a determined and fierce fighter for what she believes in, and truly believes she is doing what's best for this country. Her biggest mistake was underestimating the political genius of Senator Obama and his wonderful campaign team.

There is no doubt that Senator Clinton's tough fight has made Senator Obama a better candidate. Over the course of the long primary season, he became a better debater, showed his strength and resolve, and let himself become better known to the entire country. Clinton ending her campaign now allows the Democrats to benefit from the 50 state campaign of the primary season, while still reserving five months to hit Senator McCain and the Republican machine hard.

Now is the time for all Democrats (and dissatisfied Republicans and Independents) to get together and rally behind Senator Obama. This year may represent a major shift in how we view electoral politics in this country, and there are some opportunities for the Democrats to make gains not seen since the New Deal Coalition was formed in the early 1930s.

To all of the passionate Clinton supporters out there, I salute your dedication to your candidate, and hope you will give Senator Obama a chance. Ninety percent of their policy positions are the same, and their differences are minor compared to what John McCain stands for. If you care about fixing our health care mess, preserving a woman's right to choose, and restoring our standing abroad, Senator Obama is your candidate.

To all of you Obama supporters, celebrate this victory for about ten minutes, and get ready for the second half. The Republicans and their Rovian machine are revving up for this battle, and we would do well to meet them there. I have great faith in Obama's ability to overcome the opposition, but he can't do it without our help. We have shown what can be accomplished when people take an active role in shaping their government already, now it's time to finish the job. Help the supporters of Clinton up, be graceful in victory, and realize that now is the time to move on to the next set of challenges.

Game On!