Showing posts with label President Barack Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Barack Obama. Show all posts

Friday, March 18, 2016

Where I Pivot away from the Primaries, and Towards the General Election

Putting it out there right now: Bernie Sanders will not be the nominee of the Democratic party for the 2016 Presidential race.

Look, I know the Sanders camp is still beating the drums and saying it's still feasible for them to win. "Wait 'til New York, Bernie's a native." 
"California, folks, that's the place you oughta be. Bernie will win there."
"Don't forget Montana and Idaho. Bernie will do great there!"

Nope. Uh-unh. And true, but those states have like six delegates. It's not enough. The math is just not there.  Anybody who thinks otherwise is either a) Just not ready to face the facts or b) is willfully lying in the pursuit of their own interests. If you're the latter, well, you won't be convinced by me because you're lying. But if you're the former, perhaps you can be convinced.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Democratic National Convention: Day Two Recap

After two nights of both conventions being down, the score is:

Democrats: 2
Republicans: 0

And if you broke down the scores it isn't even close. Elizabeth Warren and Bill Clinton came out and made great cases for why the Democrats should not only retain the White House, but gain back control of Congress. Just watch their speeches for yourself

Here's the future junior senator from Masschusetts:



And here's Bill Clinton's hell of a speech:



Tonight Barack Obama will accept the nomination as Democratic candidate for President of the United States. Obviously his speech will be the most anticipated, but there are several other speakers to look forward to, such as Vice President Joe Biden and the always fun Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer.

As always, we'll be keeping up with the convention on twitter.

Saturday, August 8, 2009

An Open Letter to President Obama

Dear Mr. President,

I hope things are going well for you in your new job. From what I have seen, you have done many good things and begun erasing the stain of the previous administration. I congratulate you on the successful appointment of Justice Sotomayor, and hope that you can get some measure of relaxation on your upcoming vacation.

Starting with your famous speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, I have been a eager supporter of you. Your election as my senator in 2004 was a bright spot in an otherwise dark election day. I was ecstatic when you announced your candidacy for President on that frigid February day in Springfield. The moment when the networks declared you the winner of the election last November still remains one of my favorite memories ever.

For the most part I have been pleased by the things you and the members of your administration has accomplished. I hope you are still as committed to closing the national disgrace of Guantanamo as your Executive Order said you were. I wish you were more emphatic of your support of the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell, and weren't so wishy-washy on the Honduras situation. However, for the most part these are just minor issues.

I wish you the best of luck as the fight for health care heats up as it heads towards floor votes in Congress. After all, this was one of the biggest, if not the biggest, part of your domestic plan during the campaign. Failure to create "Change We Can Believe In" will not only harm your political agenda, it will hurt many Americans who are already hurting far too much. I am sure you understand how important this issue is.

I assure you that real and lasting health care reform is very important to us Americans who elected you. It is why we assented to you welcoming Joe Lieberman back into the fold without any real consequences. After all, you have preached empathy and forgiveness, and the potential political capital doesn't hurt either. No action for the rights of our GLBT citizens? It will come, we rationalized, we need to focus on health care. Other important issues to the progressives who helped get you elected need to be delayed? No problem, we're going for health care first.

What has all that capital bought so far? Not all that much, as far as I can tell. All I read about are secret deals with the Pharmaceutical giants, pressure for any bill to be "bi-partisan", and secret negotiations by self-appointed "centrists" who seem adamant on making a bill that no one will like, especially the Republicans who are supposedly involved.

I understand the complexity of our government. I'm well aware that most of the country, yourself included, are more to the right of my ideas. Compromise, behind-the-scenes negotiation, and parliamentary machinations are a necessary and vital part of a representative democracy. As much as a large portion of us on the left would like to deny it, we have to be willing to work with the Blue Dogs. I believe in the ideas of congenial cooperation and consensus building.

What I don't agree with is completely selling out core principles of the plan. At many of your town halls, you have done an excellent job of debunking the ridiculous crap coming out the mouths of the Limbaugh/Beck/BillO/GOP brigade. You've also seemed very committed to a strong public option, a real choice that can compete with the bloated insurance companies. I would like to think those who are skeptical of reform would change their mind if they heard your words.

However, it appears that this supposed critical plank is being eroded. Senators such as Jeff Bingaman and Kent Conrad don't seem confident that the public option can get passed, despite a large percentage of Americans supporting this option. Instead, the talk seems to be shifting towards some weak-ass coop idea, an idea that seems like a chickenshit cop-out.

I am sorry for the passionate language in the previous paragraph. This issue means a great deal to me, and I can tend to get carried away. I just don't understand why you would be so bold as to state your strong preference for a public option to us, but clearly don't care about it when talking to your buddies in the Senate.

I just don't see the strategy in place here, unless it is a strategy meant to betray the American people. I mean, Senator Baucus seems intent on sacrificing CHIP, a program he seems to be very proud of if you view his website. What the hell kind of compromise is it if he is willing to remove care for children just to appease some Republican who would never vote for the bill? How exactly is this change we can believe in?

Your administration seems far too reactive in getting its message out. How is it that a party that controls the White House and both houses of Congress doesn't seem able to get on one page, or even come close to controlling the message on the issue? Why do you not feel it necessary to get out and take this message to the people in a big way. The town hall meetings are a good start, but it still doesn't seem like you are engaged as much as you should be.

I understand why you don't want to engage the lunatics that seem to be intent on disrupting the genuine discussion of ideas. Hopefully their misplaced anger will dissipate as August moves on towards September. Still it is unfortunate that it appears your chief of staff is more concerned with yelling at progressives than getting Blue Dogs in line or dealing with Republican falsities.

I don't offer my concerns out of dislike, or even disappointment. I only offer them out of genuine curiosity at what is going on. Its very possible that you have an excellent strategy in place, and we will really see it in action once Congress gets back from its recess. It wouldn't be the first time that you and your advisers instincts have been better than mine.

I still trust that my vote wasn't in vain, and that we will see some genuine progress and improvement in this country. We need real solutions, and elected you and your colleagues up the street to provide those answers. Universal Health Care has been an issue in this country since the early 20th century. It is time we finally join the 21st century in regards to health care.

Sincerely,

Andrew C. Tate

P.S. I apologize, but I am withholding any donations to you, congressional democrats, or the DNC until a real health care bill is passed. I hope you understand that I require an appropriate level of return before I invest any of my resources. Unless my donation allows me to discuss this situation one on one with you, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Baucus, or any of your other colleagues, I figure my donation won't be much use.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

A few quick words on Obama's Address to Congress

Man, its nice having a President who sounds like an adult, isn't it? More talk about getting real things done, and less talk about manimals. It is almost surreal to listen to President Obama after the eight years of President Bush.


(p.s. be watching this blog for more about our most recent Ex-President)

(p.p.s. Holy Krikes, Bobby Jindal sounds like Kenneth the Page!)

UPDATE: A Summary of Jindal's Response:

Obama is very popular, lets not rain on his parade. However, he is a socialist, and therefore our enemy. We must remember his administrations failure during Hurricane Katrina, and cut the hell out of taxes. Because Dubya was on the right track, he just didn't go far enough. Obviously, y'all are dumb as a box of rocks because you don't have vouchers for your schoolin, so I'll speak to you like you are a third grader. High speed rail is bad, we must stay horribly behind in our infrastructure. Because public expenditures are just the anti-democratic thing, reminiscent of the horrible investment by that horrible socialist Dwight Eisenhower in the commie Interstate system. All hail the church of unregulated commerce. The oligarchies demand it, and therefore they shall get it! May Jebus bless you and the United States.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

What's Next?


Thus ended the Presidency of George W. Bush and began the administration of President Barack Obama.

(Yes, its okay to smile when you say it. In fact, say it again: President Barack Obama.)

Some talking heads have decided to trash his inaugural address, but I disagree. It was a sober call to action, a sign that the grown-ups have moved in at 1600 Pennsylvania (Sasha and Malia excepted). The speech was a clear rebuke of the Bush Administration, and a clear sign that this will be a different White House in almost every way. Our nation has many problems to solve, and its time to stop the childish bickering and get to work. We have done it before, and we can do it again.

So celebrate the victory tonight, we've certainly earned it after the eight years of President Bush. But tomorrow, its time to roll up our sleeves and get to work. It won't be easy, but then very little worth doing rarely is.

To wrap up, I leave you with this excellent performance that took place between the inauguration of Vice President Biden (no more Old Man Cheney!) and President Obama. Much like Obama's speech it encapsulates the moment.